tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7158878824897351883.post3798417305272465903..comments2023-11-05T02:37:21.043-05:00Comments on Cyber Forensics: Does Digital Forensics Suffer from Physics Envy?Dr. Angzthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04351800794237633199noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7158878824897351883.post-59851669397694223412011-03-30T22:59:17.395-04:002011-03-30T22:59:17.395-04:00If we are a technology I feel that it is important...If we are a technology I feel that it is important to maintain a "scientific" approach to how we operate. We need to maintain the step by step proofs and tests that give our field (our technology) validity. <br /><br />This would also help to keep us from becoming a pseudo-profession and allow us to have the credibility of a science without fitting necessarily into the field of science. <br /><br />Based upon the definitions in the blog, I would have to agree that we are a technology.Auptykhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08004199138683811845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7158878824897351883.post-38820580951410994132011-03-30T21:10:45.780-04:002011-03-30T21:10:45.780-04:00Digital forensics is obviously a technology and co...Digital forensics is obviously a technology and considered by many to also be a science, however the field is not currently using scientific methods. It uses technologies that have not been scientifically tested for reliability, thus not holding up to its name.<br /><br />Since Digital forensics is being recognized as a science, then DF evidence in court should be considered scientific and held to the Daubert standards.<br /><br />If we do not start proving tool reliability through publication and peer review, then we will turn into a junk science (or remain a junk science depending on how you look at it).Kelly Colenoreply@blogger.com